Monday, June 20, 2016
Semantics and Perpetual B.S.
Deliberately omitting specific labels like, "radical Islamic terrorism" is an oddly evasive maneuver and everyone knows it. In WWII we didn't refer to The war with Nazism as a "war against bad people." Certainly defining the threat accurately isn't a "strategy" and no one has implied that. The clear and deliberate omission on the part of the president and other assorted left wing ideologues frames a very real threat by radical Islamists (tied closely to a specific religious belief system) as an ill-defined escape route for those who can't come out and "tell it like it is." "...Man caused disasters...workplace violence..." Really! Do Obama and his followers really think people are that stupid.
This issue is similar to those that see a virtual equivalency between an extremist who bombs an abortion clinic and a global state sponsored terror network that seeks the death and subjugation of millions. I know of no nut-case militia groups or anti-abortion fanatics that seek nuclear weapons and the imposition of a style of government that controls all aspects of modern life with an end goal of subjugating the entire planet.
This emperor has no clothes.
